array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(13068)
}
}

Anonymous
Years ago
'best PGs in the NBA'
It seems people always fire up when a "best...." type post appears. It is so redundant. The game is 5 on 5. You pick a TEAM of five not individuals. I would have bowen at small forward in phoenix instead of marion, does that mean he's a better player, hell no but he is a better fit. Parker burns with speed and finishes in the lane, perfect fit for a team with a post threat. You just can't go making lists of the top players at specific positions without acknowledging their position within the team.
Billups, kidd, nash, williams, davis, paul, parker are all gun point men. Kidd and nash may be a step above the others but essentially they are all great players who play similar roles on their teams.
