
If I Was Mal - What Are My Thoughts On Phil?
The same board that could not find money to replace\repair Murray Magpie - hehe , still laughing when I heard that form a board member several years ago.

Whatever - I always love people that ask people to post under there real names, but post under a nickname themselves ... isn't that Hypocritical?
Anyways - I agree that Phil did exceptional well under the circumstances under previous management, but Phil has now been given pretty much anything he wants, and has quality players - and is failing to deliver.
Now Skud - why can't I explore the idea of what Mal is thinking, why is he off limits compared to Phil?
Is it just because he is a nice guy with a good resume?


Frank Arsego - now that is a name that I haven't heard in a while that is more than capable at coaching NBL - and we could have Ninnis and Stacker available - so we do have at least three decent options right now if we dump Phil.
I think Phil should go now before too much more damage is done, and by starting this thread I am trying to work out how management are justifying keeping Phil on.
IMO - it felt like last season management wanted the Sixers to fail, then spectactualy rise again from the ashes like a Phoenix, instead of a proper gradual rebuild over several years - and what a failure that plan has been!
I am still laughing a Phil's master stroke of bringing in Timmons last season - FFS, Mark Davis is currently in better shape than Timmons and would kicked more ass, and attracted more fans back to the game!
Phil - I respect what you have done previously for the Sixers and Australian BBall - but it is time to move on!

