array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(13592)
}
}
Anonymous
Years ago
Better NBA Method? Draft/Develop vs Trade/Sign
You could argue for both methods, as well as a combination. The negatives are pretty scarey for both methods though. Atlanta has great depth right now, they have developed a young side but in a few years do you really think they will be able to keep them all??? Joe will want max, j-smith will want max, then you have the other josh, marvin, sheldon, and round it out with two rookies, one of which could demand big money. thats a lot of big contracts. I guess some teams are just destined to be minor clubs that feed the big fish.
If you'd rather just buy talent- look at the knicks, they buy guys that have career years (in their contract season er der)and put together a team of guys who have got theirs and just don't care.
Jazz are probably the best example of mixing free agents with developed draft picks.
I like toronto's strategy of using euro talent. they are generally more team orientated and less greedy for the bling bling.