array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(14018)
}
}
I may be reading it differently to you Anon but the fluke word was mentioned relating to the 3 point shot, not the rebound. The rebound is there for the taking by anyone on either side. Its not a fluke to grab a rebound whoever it is that gets it. However, converting that offensive rebound to a 3 point shot is not a fluke either. It was lucky because it could have missed, but not a fluke. The Bullets won the game by 4 points so it was still a win without that 3 point shot. I am not the only one criticising Westover's comments after that game, it was just plain stupid from a coach who should show much more professionalism.
Anon #164285, we have already discussed and acknowledged the full content of Westover's comments. Despite any of that, he did say that Ere's shot was a fluke. That is the biggest load of crap when its aimed at a player who has consistently performed at the highest level regardless of anything else Westover said. His exact words were "He hit the big three when it was tied up but that was more of a fluke than anything.". It has to raise the question of how many (if any) of Ere's shots are flukes or just pure skill in a game that few can match.