array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(14424)
}
}
Anonymous
Years ago
Worst features of this year's schedule
Good point Oden! I think you're right as it looks like the Brisbane International Motor Show is on at the Convention Centre this weekend.
I agree with Statman on the play twice arrangement over a 24 game season. Not only would this even things up somewhat, but it would make the scheduling a little easier with less games to coordinate.
Home games would drop from 15 to 12 which could be a problem for Clubs needing the extra gate money.
As the alternative of playing each team three times (making for a 36 game season), seems too many, the other option would be the introduction of new teams.
While I'm not a big fan of non-Australian teams, I heard last week from an informed source that there is talk of a team from Hong Kong being looked at for 2009/2010.
As the Hawks now look good for next season, perhaps a 14 team league running a 26 game schedule may look pretty good next year.