
Poaching by any name.
I have spoken to a player and the parent, who were approached a number of years ago by another clubs team manager in the same age group. Strangely this was done directly after a summer season grand final where the player had played against the team that was trying to poach him. The player and parent declined the approach, however didn't inform their club at the time as they did not know that it was not allowed. It was only found out when all players within the team were asked if they had ever been approached by another club, they have since been instructed to inform the club immediately if they are spoken to by another club in the future.


Perhaps poaching is a bad word which which causes reactions.
What is it called when a player has it 'suggested' by an opposition coach (with higher interests) that it would be very beneficial for the players development to move to another club?(wow- this coach may even be the new team coach for the player)
The parent and player become interested and are advised that said club cannot move on player, but if the family chooses to move clubs, all is OK

Anon- obviously I am talking about older age groups. Be good if people could use a bit of common sence and and value with their posts.

Bravo "Skin"
IMO you should play for your nearest club. It's better for the competition and it's better for your growth.
As you say, if you're an OK player, why warm the bench for all stars when you could play against them and improve your game and be a better player.
Does BSA need to introduce zones?

It's quite funny really, that people move to get better chances to make state teams etc.
Bottom line is this may only effect (if it occurs) the 9th and 10th player, if you are a gun you will get picked, who ever you play for.
I don't see the point in a ok player going to a good team and sitting on the bench, when they can start for another team and develop their game by playing against good players.
Each to their own tho.
