
Sengstock - Sixers & The Cap
I speak of Adelaide because that is the team I am involved with but if it only had a 2nd tier team, then you would have to assume that the better players like Ballinger, Schenscher, Holmes, Bruce, imports etc would not stay here but look for a more lucrative role in a 1st tier team elsewhere. I don't agree with reducing the quality as that would not bring the fans in. From what I understand the 36ers would be made up only of players like Burdon, Hoban, perhaps Davidson, Cooper, Winitana and then some of the better ABA players. As passionate a fan of the 36ers that I am, if my opinion is any indication, I would not be supporting a team like that. We already have enough divisions in NBL, ABA, A grade juniors etc down the line. I am happy to watch ABA games to fill in the basketball need in the NBL off season, but always look forward to the 36ers.

Isaac, do you think the 2nd tier league would attract supporters when there is a superior league to follow? I think we somehow have a 2nd tier already in ABA and there is no where near enough people supporting it even with a salary cap of $800K. I am not quite sure how a 2 tier league would work and whether there would be any point in having it. If there were 2 teams in Adelaide, the 36ers with a salary cap of $1.2m and a 2nd tier team on a cap of $800K, I know where my interest would be. I don't play basketball so my interest is on entertainment value. Entertainment would have to be superior on the $1.2m cap as it would attract the more skilled players.

The salary cap at $1.2m is unsustainable for the League at this present moment. It goes against all the safeguards they are trying to put in place. I would imagine players to be more interested at this point in time in having a league to play for than an over inflated salary. Not to say they will play for nothing but around the $800K mark is more workable.

I hope for two things:
1) the consortium finds the money they need and the Sixers are able to play this season.
2) common sense prevails on the salary cap and it is set quite a bit lower than it was last season. ie, at a level where player payments don't cripple the ability of organisations to at least break even.
C'mon Larry and the consortium - get these things done and done right and we can all go back to enjoying a financially stable league where the focus is on the court, not whether the owner can afford to pay the bills!

I might be grasping, but that's sounding positive.
