array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(20143)
}
}
Who Me! that sounds so funny and yet not that far fetched. As ridiculous as it sounds that both these players would sign for minimum, it wouldn't surprise me that their contracts show a minimum amount but would be earning money in ways that don't count towards the cap. Both these player could be shown as earning coaching dollars for their role in developing the rookies in their training sessions. Their playing contracts would show $60K for playing and then $500k for training and development as an example. You hear it so many times how senior players impart their knowledge and experience on the rookie players so why not pay them 2 salaries?