array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(2111)
}
}
If Brisbane lose game 2, it will be absolutely criminal that they eliminated a team that had potential to go all the way. It really makes a farce of the finals format when Brisbane can be so inconsistent that they can't win the championship but can play the odd good game to stuff up some other team's chances. Sour grapes? Perhaps. But it really applies to anyone who may have been in Adelaide's situation. BTW on Talking Hoops radio program tonight, Brett Maher also stated that the finals format was not ideal and also backed up by Andrew Gaze. Who in the hell would vote for such a system when players and coaches of high esteem disagree with it. The media has also had a dig at the format for the last 4 days. Its been a hot topic and yet the NBL states that all the team's voted on the format before the season began. I might need to ask the question of who's signatures appear on the vote.