
Burston, Schenscher or Both?
Johnson certainly killed us in the Game That Should No Longer Be Mentioned. Be a nice pick-up.

I would love to see Luke back in Sixer colours, even though i got love for Burston, But Luke's my boy and i wanna see the Ranga Banga back with Luke and Balls.
Having both would be an awesome thing too cos we could move Balls down to SF where i personally think he would murder teams!

Burston over Schench, by just a little.
Both would be good, but would also likely create some structural problems as neither are the agile type bigs for example that Perth have used with success over the years building the 'Perth Wall'.
Neither is something I do not want to contemplate. Would leave a huge hole in the middle that is unlikely to be able to be filled by another Aussie player.

Probably Big Red.
* Better Free Throw Shooter
* Great in the Low Post
* Makes the interior harder to guard as Red and Balls are both 25-30ppg players on any night.
* May be "more foul prone" than Burston, but better shot blocker and has a better mid range game.
* Preferred rebounder so Balls can focus on getting up the court for shots.
* Alot better for a playmaker to run passes through
Burtson is great; but didn't offer a great scoring option for the team. Had Balls and Luke been playing again this year, then I think gilly would have had alot more passing options; as well as a better option for running the pick through.
What can I say, last year with the twin gingers, bruce running the plays and (yes, I'll say it) Hodge playing the versitile swingman role on the wing, you had arguably one of the best lineups I've seen the sixers with since the 98-99 season.

I can't decide - even.
Even NBL sats has them both 10 and 6 this season.

Weapons of mass destruction as 2 low posts.
