array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(23441)
}
}
I think it's a stupid rule. As other posters have said, just another thing for refs to make a mistake about and players to get angry about, for no real gain besides an extra dunk or two.
Never been a fan of any charges being taken inside the key at all. If you have given an offensive player enough room or have been beaten to the key than the offensive player has one thing on his mind - shoot. At this point the defender should also have one thing on his mind block/challenge the shot, too many times we see defenders not even consider the offensive shot and take the option of trying to draw a charge.
Also their is nothing better than seeing the bigs go at it rather than seeing them flopping against each other.
How it will be interpreted may well mean it is better left out but if they can get it right I think it will be good.