
Malone vs Duncan
Thats a ridiculous statement. I could turn around to you and say the Lakers only got it done this year because circumstances in celtics town enabled them to, and the year before because circumstances in rockets town enable them to.

How did a Malone v Duncan thread turn into a Lakers thread?? This is nothing to do with them.
So basically what i am getting from the last few posts is that the Spurs only won a few championships because the Lakers were "Vunerable"?? What a load of garbage, I could make the same argument for my Rockets based on their injuries in the last 5 years. The lakers weren't good enough those years, just like 29 other teams weren't good enough those years.
Duncan is one of the greatest all time, it doesn't matter who he had on his team or who he played against to win championships, because at the end of the day, he got it done.

Duncan easily. The guy lead his team to 4 championships. I don't care who he had to beat in the finals. Malone is clearly the next best along with Barkley, Garnett, Mchale, Pettit who are all around the mark.

good to hear other opinions on some difficult and maybe controversial choices. thanks to aussiecamp for raising the topic
(Mod: Hate to be a killjoy, but read the guidelines. Then don't thank yourself for starting a topic. Then don't change username to respond to that topic, three different times.)
