array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(23974)
}
}
I think there is a lot of blame put on channel ten here for no valid reason. The NBL had to change the usual saturday night games to fridays and sundays because thats what suited One HD as they had their own commitments. So to me it would have sounded like the meeting would have been along the lines of One HD saying we will broadcast games on these nights/days, so then it would have been the NBL's responsibility to put the schedule together of who is versing who and when. Im pretty certain channel ten is only broadcasting due to the days as mentioned by someone else. If your all tearytown over it complain about the NBL more so. Personally i think some people need to just suck it up and be happy with what you get.
E, it is on TV for the first time in over a decade. I couldn't care less which games they actually show.
Here's and idea: Why don't you come up with an alternative roster of games that the could have shown that fall within the broadcast timeslots and that would give absolute parity to every team and therefore deliberately ignoring OneHD's largest market audiences?
Do you go on AFL websites and complain that Collingwood gets more Friday night games at the 'G than Fremantle?