Hoops

Start a new topic

Choose the category that best suits your topic.

Check this if your topic contains a game spoiler (e.g., an NBA game that might be televised later).

Check this if your topic is spam.

You must read the Terms of Use. Please do not post offensive material.
Learn how to embed YouTube videos or tweets

array(2) { [0]=> string(815) " select r.*, rc.info, t.title as threadtitle, u.username as username, u.anonymous as useranonymous, `f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`, `ft`.`name` AS `flairname`, `ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`, `ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon` from reply as r join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id join user as u on u.id = r.userid left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid` left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid` where r.businessid = :businessId and r.threadid = :threadId group by r.id order by r.utcdated desc limit 0,50 " [1]=> array(2) { ["businessId"]=> int(1) ["threadId"]=> int(24124) } }

Anonymous

Years ago

NBL: your thoughts on video tech

totally understand that the rule is not in force in the NBL (yet, watch this space). What i was illuding to was that the rule does not allow for the referee to check if a foul occured before time expired. That was the point.

Reply #293962 Report this topic

Anonymous

Years ago

also the discussion about technology for a call is irrelevent. The rule allows for 2 things.

1) whether a shot is erroneously called a 2 and not a 3 or visa versa,at the end of a period
2) if a shot was released before time expired at the end of a period.

Thats it, there is no other reason for going to video replay.

Here is the rule:
46:12

The referee has been authorised in the previous rules to use technical equipment to decide if a last shot at the end of each period or any extra period was released during playing time.

This authorisation is expanded in the 2010 rules to include the use of such equipment at the end of each period or extra period to determine if a shot for goal counts for 2 or 3 points.

Reply #293767 Report this topic

Years ago

If they DIDN't go to the replay what call would they have settled on.

Would they have decided the foul was called, the clock was stopped on 0.00 and the buzzer had not sounded therefore the fouled occured before time expired?

As for the technology argument, what about Tennis, centre court or a couple of courts use/have hawk eye technology but the scrubs playing on the other courts do not.

Many decisions get changed by the use of hawk eye, so a clear disadvantage to the lower ranked players who don't get to play on these courts.

Reply #293716 Report this topic

SRT070

Years ago

what the hell is with my double posts!

Reply #293619 Report this topic

SRT070

Years ago

anon i disagree having a rule for sixth foul is completely irrelevant and inconsistent with our discussion. This is a referees aid. How many times would this type of situation occur? Its very rare so technology should be allowed. But the nbl did state they didnt allow it so essentially it shouldnt have even gotten to what happened but im happy the right call was made

Reply #293618 Report this topic

SRT070

Years ago

Reply #293617 Report this topic

SRT070

Years ago

I see the slingers have finally launched their new website. Must say at first glance it is quite impressive. Much better than the dodgy looking thing they first released a couple of months back.

www.singaporeslingers.com.sg

Reply #837794 Report this topic

Start a new topic

NBL: your thoughts on video tech

Reply to this topic

Recent Posts