array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(24474)
}
}
It's not the comments per say, after all it's good to see some rivalry between the clubs. Yeah, it makes my day stirring the pot. But, at least I put my name to it!
If there are 12 teams in Div 2, IMO, the BSA rule should be one spot per member club + on each for Cougars and Magic. Then, if lack of nominations, then open it up to a second team.
The only issue with having two Div 2 teams is that they must be run as two separate teams. One assumes that the two coaches get together and review who they have played, strengths weaknesses etc to help each other out. And for those Poindexters who say is doesn't happen, then those coaches are dumb coaches.