

Do you mean Shannon or Howard ?
Anyways - Shannon seems ok.
Clarke and Howard seem virtually over.
While Greenwood trained pretty well here today.

For those who have watched the Sixers train - how has Shannon performed there? Is he as lost as he appears at game time?

Carter/Bruce might be a long term thing
'fans' of Clarke. New and old 'friends'
Howard looks a little lost. That's why I would keep Bruce here, now and add Harris


It's the impermanence of Howard , then
and Clarke thinking 'bout using Harris
and 'Whatta we gonna do about Bruce, when Carter comes back.'
that makes me think about Bruce n Harris replacing Howard, now.

Herbert is worth starting over Hill. I'd look at moving hill to be a 2-guy with the potential to run Herbert and Hill at the same time.

lol @ moving Winder to the 2.
You might remember he was throwing up shots left, right and center and was missing them all.
Doubt moving him to the 2 spot would have done anything, he would have been throwing up contested shots still, fluffing layups still and missing 3's still.

It's funny how they said they'd sign a PG and a SF
then brought in 2 SGs . Must've seen something, that they thought could coach him into being a PG, for a while.
Anyways - more guards than Buckingham Palace , of course, here.. Could've done with a bitta height, instead.

Agree with original post - should have retained Winder to play at his natural position 2 spot and allowed Shannon to run the point.
Hard to believe that Howard was being considered for NBA?? He has not shown us any of that form here - he is being paid at least $100k (?) to contribute to the team. I wonder if my boss would be so forgiving?
Back on players playing their natural positions - imagine if the Sixers had a starting centre and allowed Ballinger to play at his natural power forward and Holmes at his natural 3 spot. No point having a run and gun program for a low scoring team playing out of position.

No, Winder had plenty of chances and he proved to be useless. Howard has to find a way to contribute pretty soon though, because I have not seen even a glimpse of anything positive he can do yet! We'd be better off bringing in Farley and letting him jack up some threes at this rate!

Hard to call this one. Howard did look the goods though. I agree with others that Howard does not seem to have any plays revolving around him.
