Hoops

Stuff's Hinton: "NBL is a joke", MVP night a sham

Fizzle, you can't have watched many organizations then.
If the Management putting their quest for the franchises first title before an awards dinner on the other side of the Tasman is arrogant then so be it, I tend to call it focused.
Great win by Perth in game one, their 3rd quarter D was great and really put NZ on the back foot.

Hhinton is crap, MACDUB hit the nail on the head

Aint kama a bitch - Breakers cop a $10k fine to stay home and prepare while the other team stays home, same fine and travels from Perth to NZ and wins by 23 points. Looks like it was $500 per point well spent by the Wildcats. Look forward to Hinton's next article.

Personally I don't think Lemanis did a COTY job with the Breakers this season. They have the deepest team in the league, were expected to finish 1st and they did.

While I think Gleeson was probably a little lucky to win the award, if Bozo the Clown, aka Marc Hinton had looked at the whole thing objectively instead of through Breakers coloured eyes he'd realise that Gleeson's Crocs got rid of the reigning MVP and replaced him with someone not quite as good, though they did add a class centre, and had others contributing to a second place finish with a better record they had in 2009-10.

From what I've seen Hinton's article isn't much different to a few others in NZ when it comes to "their" sports teams playing in Aussie based competitions. Its pretty much always an "us against them" mentality. Nothing short of winning every award on offer plus the premisership/championship will ever satisfy some Kiwi writers and even then you get the feeling that some would still find something to bitch about. Be it the NBL, the NRL, the Super Rugby comp or the ANZ Championship, they're never satisfied. But I do think they're actually worse still when their Kiwi team isn't winning.

This is a combination problem right here.

You have to in-part blame the NBL for poor planning for the MVP awards night. A week break prior to the first finals game could have been perfectly fine to prevent any of this. To an extent, there is an understanding as to why there's resent towards fining teams who won't attend a league wide event.

As for the article, MACDUB pretty much hits the nail on the head. Hinton has the passion for sport obviously in the manner of his writing, but lacks any form of common sense or understanding of the sport. Think the article puts a damper on the event and completely ignores other awards for the Breakers.

Bad Form.

Very shappy from a shabby author of sports fiction.

Let me just say Marc Hinton is an idiot.
His views in no way reflect the thoughts of myself. Im sure mystro is pretty anti-Hinton as well..correct me if im wrong..

The problem with Hinton and many writers over here in NZ, is that they write articles on many different sports. Hinton is a writer for Basketball, Rugby,and Cricket.
Hinton, like most NZ writers, is a "jack of all trades, but master of none".
It is clear he is uninformed and does not know the finer details of the league.

One of his quotes that pissed me off, printed in a recent article, was something along the lines of:

"Lemanis went 22-6. How does a coach that gets 22 wins (6more than his nearest rival) not win COTY".

That is just ridicolous..you can't just judge a coaches ability on W-L record..Have to factor in:
-Strength of roster: Breakers easily have the deepest roster in the league
-adversity/ disruptions that a coach will have to deal with: apart from Penney chasing his NBA dream, Lemanis didn't have to deal with too much adversity and/or injuries.
Gleeson had to deal with alot of adversity as many fans and followers criticised his decision to offload Homicide

That should say 'more wins' not 'one more win' than the only other minor premier. Whatever. Last season was the closest contested in history.

I think this frankly misleading point epitomises the poor quality of the whole article:

'The Breakers went 22-6 this year - an unprecedented achievement since the season went to 28 games.'

It was a 30 game season in 2008-9. So, he means it is unprecendented over the whole sample size of two seasons? It is unprecedented because they had one more win than the only other minor premier he wants to compare against?

If he bothered to go back just one season further, he would have seen that Sydney only lost 3 games in 2007-8 (only three years ago) in a 30 game season. Is he trying to suggest that the Breakers' achievement is unprecedented in the face of that?

It took me all of 3 minutes to look up the above stats. If that is journalism, I am glad we have Boti.

NZ Media are fairly uninformed when it comes to basketball and expected the Breakers dominant season to translate into individual accolades on awards night. It didn't and therefore rubbish like this gets printed. I think all the awards went to deserving players.