
Woolpert is upset
Radford : ' It's not been easy for us , there's been changes. Leeanne Grantham has been brought in.' sic.
Weigh (last week ) : ' We're doing more than worrying about the win loss column. ' yuk.
I'm not mucha fan of Weigh-Clarke. I like Maher.
Each person has his own preference.

Simpson reckons he was fouled and cramped up onair@fiveaa. He has to be lighter for this league , he didn't know that.
( Cornesy still grilled Radford for 5 minutes about the tech. Radford was elusive for about four , but Cornesy is skillfull and got it out of him , eventually.)

I've been following the NBL since 1984 and I can't predict what the referees will call/decide and from what Ive heard Diamon is not a very very smart basketballer.

Seems simple really -
Crocs Fan - wasnt a dead ball and not dangerous situation therefore incorrect call
36ers Fan - potentially dangerous situation and ball out of court therefore correct call
IMO the poor play of Crawford was way more influential than the refs. For someone who was touted by some a a Boomer certainlty he had an absolute shocker!



Isaac, guess you would call it a typical judgement call.
The ball had been passed in and TVL were already over half court by the time the whistle blew.

Make that "Wouldn't do this for an NBL level competition with the pay they are on".

He has some valid points that he raises.
I'm for one, a person who believes that players shouldn't get paid (or at least as much) for a bad performance.
While I would say this for the NBL level of pay, I would certainly think it's something valid to consider for Soccer, NFL, NBA players etc. who get paid a mint for doing next to nothing.
Also agree that blowing the whistle when someone is limping down the floor was a bad move. Glad to see the team win, but that's a very odd call to make by the refs.
When Redhage did his hip in, I remember the game continuing until there was a dead ball.
