array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(27625)
}
}

Years ago
#believethehype NBA AllStar Saturday Night Podcast
The scores from the 'seconds' tournament at Nunawading are up to date ,well presented and easy to access and cross check. By comparison the classics, small 'c' intentional, are woefully inadequate and using yesterdays technology (not to mention;not working).
Just which of these tournaments is supposed to be a show piece of basketball talent in the land?
And while I'm on the soap box, me thinks the classics has got too big for a weekend event,with gradings and pools even moreso than ever the dictator of final positions.
