array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(3062)
}
}
What's the big problem? Simply ring up that prick at Sydney and ask how they manage the salary cap each year- and not get fined.
Do Sydney have a franchise team further North with the same system allowing Bradke and Co to all sign up?
Why can't he hold a 2nd job. If he did promotional work for Distinctive Homes or any of the other sponsors and was paid directly by the sponsor, how would that affect the salary cap? It would have nothing to do with the salary cap at all or the NBL for that matter. In any other industry, you can hold more than one job where each job is quite independent of each other.