array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(30994)
}
}

Years ago
Anstey & Flynn were right on NBL refs
see this is where the refs should be held accountable and should attend post match conferences. its one thing to call a foul but another to back it up with a replay and ask the same question.
however would be a first if they did

Years ago
There is a stigma to the term 'unsportsman-like' [for me, anyway] & 'intentional' is easier to define, and so call, hopefully.
There is still the poential to call a tech for something that is clearly unsportsman-like [outside the spirit of the game] but is not obviously covered by 'intentional', which in the context implies a physical foul.

Years ago
Agreed, the Tomlinson one was wrong though and the one on Hire was soft.
Hardly game changing though, the Tigers have got bigger problems than the referees
