array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(31366)
}
}

Years ago
NCAA Championship Game
Does anybody know where you can get a copy of the game? Would be nice to have that one to hold onto for a while!

Years ago
What is people's opinion on players from clubs such as Brisbane and Sydney having to wait 2 weeks after the grand final to talk to other clubs. Wouldn't the fact that their club is going through an uncertain future exempt the players from this rule. Once an owner has stated he will be selling the club, surely the club loses the ability to hold onto their players before the 2 weeks are up. Its not the player's fault the club is in difficulty so why should they risk their future waiting around 2 weeks? I don't think that because there is going to be new owner that they automatically have first option to the existing players.
