array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(32307)
}
}
HO, this season SCM didn't have double headers which is disappointing as it is the premier league in Big V.
The whole argument with SEABL v Big V would be great if they still had the ABA tournament. It would create more debate but also end some of the outlandish comments.
The D league and Youth league joining up has shown that SEABL and Big V juniors coming through is a bright future and as a matter of fact the Big V teams were stronger overall. Both had their opinions prior to which league was better. I understand u/23s changes a lot with College players and some elevated to senior level.
To say all SEABL teams are better than the top 4 in the Big V is a cop out. The top 4 teams in Big V would certainly compete in SEABL.
The real difference between SEABL and Big V is the depth of the competition. Big V drops off after the top 5 where in SEABL the talent is quite evenly spread.