array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(34143)
}
}
Yes, ethics are questionable, as is the approach and I agree his Association should sit him down and sort it out one way or another.
Not sure what would drive a person to go down such a drastic path, so there is the issue I believe.
We can criticise him, perhaps do him for bringing the game into disrepute, because that can be used for anything, but my question here is this...
Are we looking to smack him and keep treating the symptoms or do we care enough to drill down to the cause, then look at what improvements can in fact be made, if any?
Big difference between a semi-pro league and the AFL, however I understand your point, like I said I don't agree with his method but specifically speaking he is referring to points of improvement that he believes officials are not accountable for.
The coach is obviously unaware or not privy to what the officials are accountable for, once again, I am not a fan of his method, show me where he can be actioned against please?