array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(3601)
}
}
i should have mentioned, i wasn't at the game, and dont know B McDonald.
yes, there is an issue of consistency with referees. If you stick to the rules (dont question an umpires judgement call) then you wont get T'd. Its simple. And by the sounds of it, so are you.
You can get a tech for any number of reasons, one of which is
Questioning an umpires judgement.
You cannot dispute a 'judgement call' (which most calls are). If a player says "no" right after an umpires call, that can be interpreted as questioning an umpires judgement, and hence, warrants a T.
Now, here's the complicated solution...
just play the game. Don't say anything. That way there is less chance of getting a T.