array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(38140)
}
}
Did the same with YL men last year - most found out when media release went up - no communication given to all YL players and they were left stranded as there was no tryouts for senior mens - just coach approach & selection - seems like seniors turn this year.
#412 Good idea for YL-use 18 & 20's as a lot of clubs do but they have no 20's and haven't for years. Previous YL players moving up had little chance to get in the men's teams - looked to be closed shop esp late couple of years - so no doubt moved elsewhere - look at Manny - moved and some of the other players went too. Will take more than 12-18 months to restart - or do they expect their current out of 18 & older players to hang around and wait. Don't think so.
Remove youth league for 2015 season- was this to carry the cost for move to SCW and now no Senior Men - many things to wonder about - Reading there notice on the website - looking to build from with in -YL first 2017 - where does that leave the players from "with in" previously at SP who had no opportunity to move up to the men's team over the past few years - Started to look like becoming a female association now confirmed you could think.