
Breakers vs Wildcats, Dec 2
Of course he realises Knight flopped. The point was, how do the refs fall for flopping/minimal contact on one end but not the other...let alone the fact they didn't appear to give Knight a warning.Knight did get a flop warning, you can hear the PA announcer mention it after the Jervis "foul".

Fans making racists remarks to players when there is players of the same colour on their own team makes absolutely no sense.
Racist people are idiots and the scum of our society.

Pretty pissed off that someone apparently yelled racist comments at Nathan Jawai whilst on the bench last night.
Hopefully if true the offender is pointed out and banned.
No need for that crap.


Flop party
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5sip69SMpTw&feature=youtu.be
Not the reason the cats lost. But pretty terrible reffing to fall for it twice.


regardless of the result the refs need to get on Charles Jackson.....falls to the floor constantly then runs off with a smug grin.
Not a good look for the league.
In addition Jawai is copping a raw deal week after week cause of his size....punters want to see him play...have to look after him a bit better.

Great analysis Nathan.
No secret that I'm a one eyed cats fan but you cant look at those stats and say the Ref's were the reason Perth lost. Its pretty dam clear looking at those stats where the game was won and lost.
The officiating this year in general has been below par but it doesn't favor any teams in particular.

We contained New Zealand from beyond the arc fine for most of the game. They just then nailed the last 4 in a row after shooting below 25% up till that point.
They made 8/22 3pt, we made 9/21 (which hides that we went 2/7 to end it). So I wouldn't say failing to contain them from beyond the arc was the problem.
That 44-31 rebound differential, and the 28/50 2pt vs 17/49 2pt differential was the real story.
Our big guys didn't perform to the standard that they ought.

On the other hand, at least we didn't have a 9-31 quarter against the Crocs, like the Taipans just had. Holy crap.

@Anon
"Im not saying you are using that excuse, but other have, just insane. Wasn't even close, Breakers hit 4 straight 3's in the 4th."
Ahh.. look, refereeing has its impact. Even Rhys Carter on twitter early in the game took note of three soft fouls being called on Wagstaff and said it was a momentum changing moment, and that was before Jervis got drilled similarly in that really bad last few minutes of the second quarter (which is probably where we "lost" the game).
And the team really does have a problem with letting those kinds of reversals get them down, which needs to be sorted out.
But in any sport, no ONE THING wins or loses a game. We really let ourselves down with the poor rebounding (especially during that second quarter, we got murdered) and the dry spells.
Breakers nailing four 3's in a row was definitely brutal, though. That sort of thing does happen, of course. We did that to the Hawks in the 4th quarter of our game against them, and we were on the receiving end of it this time.
We seem to frequently have these really great starts against NZ in NZ that go wildly pear-shaped, frustrating stuff.

Well, we won the first and the third quarters (the latter after digging a nice big hole for ourselves to start with) but in the 2nd and 4th, completely lost the plot.
Second quarter, okay, that was probably the height of the interesting refereeing people have been mentioning above. But the fourth quarter, only 14pts, not good enough. 31pt in the first, 17, 16, 14 after that. Just not good enough. Sure, the Breakers would have rolled us with that hot shooting streak, but our inability to score ourselves during that streak is on us.

4/17 from deep for 3 quarters, then 4/5 in the 4th. Been looking at andrewbprice's spatial jam, and that's the story of the series. Breakers averaging about 25% in the first three quarters, then >50% in the last. Clutch little buggers.

Perth were hard done by on a few calls there but welcome to what the rest of the league has put up with in Perth for years guys.
Efficient game from Abercrombie at both ends. Pledger and Jackson played great but I don't condone flopping. Jackson did well to draw attention to the first couple of hits he took and got some legit calls before he started acting like Bubbles. I like his game otherwise, he bought energy and made shots and blocked a few.

Before the NZB @ PER game last friday, I was of the opinion that if New Zealand stay fit, they would lose two more games for the season to finish 22-6, then be about a 70/30 chance of a 5th title.
I expected one of those two games to be that Friday night, and was right on that front. I'd kinda hoped that this might be the other one, since everybody loses at least one home game ... but unfortunately not to be.
Given we scraped in wins over them at Perth Arena, and just got utterly drilled over in New Zealand, probably going to have to revise that prediction. Still think New Zealand will lose another, but they'd have to be hot faves for the title now.
Webster and Cedric Jackson stay fit and they'll win it all.


A true basketball fan, no matter who they follow, could say that game was well reffed


What i need right now is for Homicide Williams to pop up on the commentary. I really need someone to point out that the next few minutes of this game are crucial.


I'm not saying that 7 PF's to 16 is proof of anything, but it certainly matches up with the eye test of this game so far.









wow.. with all the Anonymous posts I thought it would be us down, but NZ is down. Wow.
Hope we can get the win.



How does the tie-breaker work if NZ wins this by 1 point?
I assume Cats get it somehow? Commentators mentioning NZ needs to win by 2+

Supernintendo Chalmers, I get the hook, I put a nice piece of floppy meat on the hook, but not one pussycat.......

This game has a bit of a playoff feel to it.
So much more to this game then just a win or lose. The winner of this game could very much decide 1st and 2nd position at the conclusion of the season or which of these 2 teams gets home court advantage over each other come finals time.
With the rematch only 5 days apart it will be interesting to see how the teams adjust to their respective deficiencies from last Fridays game.
I'm tipping NZ on this one, but if Perth can get hot from outside it could easily swing Perths way.

I wish this thing would just die already .If you have the shot attempt, take the shot. If you wanna burn time , then burn time till the game is over. Dont feel forced to adhere to some BS Basketball etiquette created Furphy where people dont shoot on /near siren.
You are plaing a professional sport here.

It wasn't the Perth Media, someone kicked off to the media in regards to this and my anti-perth memory instantly attributed this to a Wildcats player.
I thought it was Greg Hire who kicked off at Ervin for putting up a shot, my memory isn't that flash so apologies if I was full of plaque.
This happened after Ervin got upset with Hire for putting up a late three against Adelaide in 2014:
Afterwards, Hire pointed out that Ervin had done exactly the same thing earlier in the year.

I think Breakers are 6-0 at home. A win by the Cats would be massive and send a shot across the bow of the SS Breakers.
This will be a great game and with plenty to play for. The Cats should win the rebounding game, so I'm expecting two different styles of play.
Corey Webster in MVP form is scoring nearly a point per minute (0.85) at home. Beal is scoring 0.45 points per minute on the road, but Prather is killing it at 0.67 points per minute.
Therein lies the Breakers weakness. All the other Breakers are scoring at an average 0.366 points per minute. If the Cats can negate Webster, then they have a chance of bagging this bad boy. Surely 5 flops should create 5 charging fouls on Webster.
The reffing in NZ is just about Street Ball standard, so fouling out players is rare. I'm sticking with the Breakers to play a fast flowing game with only the worst argey bargey calls made. Breakers by 2.

"I dont recall Perth media ever kicking up about this happening to Perth. It was Ervin/36ers going nuts about it a couple of seasons ago though when Hire did the same thing to the 36ers."
It wasn't the Perth Media, someone kicked off to the media in regards to this and my anti-perth memory instantly attributed this to a Wildcats player.
I thought it was Greg Hire who kicked off at Ervin for putting up a shot, my memory isn't that flash so apologies if I was full of plaque.

"people give Perth shit about this because the Wildcats kicked off in the media when someone else did it to them in garbage time last season from memory"
I dont recall Perth media ever kicking up about this happening to Perth. It was Ervin/36ers going nuts about it a couple of seasons ago though when Hire did the same thing to the 36ers.

"To all those people banging on about Greg Hire shooting at the last second all the time.. every point counts.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/30249377/crunch-time-as-cats-chase-split/"
people give Perth shit about this because the Wildcats kicked off in the media when someone else did it to them in garbage time last season from memory.

Yes Corey Webster is playing and Tai Wesley may play, they'll make the call later today after the shoot around depending on how his blood tests came back last night.
NZ should get up at home for this one but will need to play a ton better than they did in Perth, especially at the freethrow line.
I also won't be surprised if NZ need overtime to get the W.
If NZ win by more than 1 point they win the season series against Perth which will be big come the business end of the season.

Will be close.
Pace/tempo of the game is critical to the result IMO.
Breakers will be trying to speed the game up. I would think the Wildcats would be trying to do the opposite considering how effective they are in that situation.
Wouldn't be surprised to see OT.
