Hoops

Start a new topic

Choose the category that best suits your topic.

You must read the Terms of Use. Please do not post offensive material.
Learn how to embed YouTube videos or tweets

array(2) { [0]=> string(815) " select r.*, rc.info, t.title as threadtitle, u.username as username, u.anonymous as useranonymous, `f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`, `ft`.`name` AS `flairname`, `ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`, `ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon` from reply as r join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id join user as u on u.id = r.userid left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid` left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid` where r.businessid = :businessId and r.threadid = :threadId group by r.id order by r.utcdated desc limit 0,50 " [1]=> array(2) { ["businessId"]=> int(1) ["threadId"]=> int(39727) } }
Anonymous
Years ago

Taipans Sign Travis Trice

I like.

Anonymous
Years ago

Huge signing, this guy is a winner playing for tom izzo at Michigan state

Years ago

Gliddon is a 2, who's saying he's a point guard?

Anonymous
Years ago

From Wilson to Wilbekin to potentially Trice, Fearne is building up a pretty good rep for identifying import PGs. If only he'd uncovered Thornton.

Years ago

Fearny bagged himself a good one me thinks.

Years ago

Jawai is the PG.

Years ago

I am a Gliddon fan but you wont be hearing that from me.

Years ago

Just waiting for the "He's not a PG, Gliddon is the PG" posts.

Years ago

This is a surprisingly good signing for Cairns.

Years ago

"Nice." <-- Just like I said ;)

Anonymous
Years ago

Nice. I reckon he could be another Ty McKee, NBA talent on many levels but not athletically. Good signing.

Years ago

Wondering what people think about the current interpretation on the by-laws where a player can play the whole season yet not be eligible for finals in any division.

For example a player plays most of the season in Div 4 then is brought up to Div 3 for the last few games of the season to cover injuries. The first part of the by-law states that they are ineligible for Div 3 as they have not played 40% of the Div 3 games. The last part states that they are ineligible for finals in all but Div 3 as they played in that Div in the last 3 rounds. My logic says that they should be eligible for Div 3 under these rules, but BSA's logic is obviously different to mine.

Does this seem like fair treatment for someone who has forked out $100's of dollars to BSA during the season and the team that works so hard to get to finals?

 

Reply to this topic

Random name suggestion for anonymous posters: Vesta 41

Rules: You must read the Terms of Use. No spam, no offensive material, no sniping at other clubs, no 'who cares?'-type comments, no naming or bashing under 18 players. Learn how to embed YouTube videos or tweets

Please proof-read your post before submitting as you will not be able to edit it afterwards.