array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(42445)
}
}
Techs or tossed for too many techs for arguing calls would be fine.
Winning MVP after starting being suspended for starting a brawl akin to Malice in the Palace? Maybe not..
Just came across as being a bit odd to me that you could win an award like league MVP after being suspended, particularly if it was for something involving violence.
No-one would argue if LeBron won MVP and had been tossed from a game (happened recently) or suspended even for too many techs so not really an issue is it?
I can understand the techs, but you can still win MVP after being suspended??? That's crazy
Why is that crazy? The only reason the Brownlow works the way it does is it's the Best and Fairest. The suspension rule is about the 'fairest' bit, MVP is just MVP.
answer is still yes. it is not fairest and best like in footy. maybe if you did something bad enough to get a year ban you would be ineligible but you wouldn't play enough games to poll enough votes to win anyway