array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(43478)
}
}
Anonymous
Years ago
Zone defence at junior classics
Just realised my post error above, should have been woodville and south always play zone.
zone is a legit tactic / play in u16s and 18s - so that's ok , just didn't work for that team. What I saw was in the lower grades where it wasn't supposed to be played. Surely if a coach / club has enough talent to get to classics they clearly know the ruling on zones in u10, 12 and 14s. What I saw was ball inbounded in the back court and 5 players either out of time outs or off a score run back and make a formation around the keyway. Not around the 3 point line or any attempt to sell it as a pack D with one or two players working the ball.