array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(4390)
}
}
Cairns want 90 all 0.7 seconds on the clock dusty's shot to be waved away for violation - 24.7 when sixers got possesion - 24 second violation leaving 0.7.
As for the 2 point error on NBL scoreboard that was at the 10:42 point mark it was posted in the other thread.
Having said all this, I think everyone should put this matter to rest and let sleeping dogs lie. The record as it stands at the moment is a win for the Sixers. Lets just leave it at that.
Are you sure that the extra 2 points weren't taken away to not count the buzzer beating 2 points from Rychart? The score only went to 94 after his last shot. In that case the Sixers still win by 2. Isaac, by the running stats I assume you mean the total of individual player scores. I've had this argument time and time again that they often don't tally making it difficult to know exactly what the score is.
If that is not the case, at what point in time did the Sixers' score increase by 2 points with no one having scored those 2 points?