
Should the WNBL hire more attractive TV hosts?
^^^ Proof there is still plenty of fish in the sea.

That's because the NBL has 20 to 1 ratio of topics/posts on this forum in general, it's a more popular league. The field hockey leagues in both men and women in this country for example are world class, but get no coverage anywhere, they're just not popular, neither is WNBL comparative to NBL.

“The fact this topic has less replies than the NBL (mens league) one shows we as a society are still so sexist!”
That’s one hypothesis. You’ve taken a generalist “political” position, namely that society demonstrates inherent sexism in promoting male endeavours (sports) more than female endeavours (sports). This is generally regarded as true. You’ve then hypothesised that this explains why one specific hoops thread has less replies than another, and attributed this to inherent sexism on the hoops forum. This could be interpreted as a misapplication of inductive reasoning. I certainly regard it as such.
An alternative hypothesis could be posited, namely that the first thread wasn’t that interesting, and that this thread is overly derivative, and therefore even less interesting. If you look at other derivative threads and counted responses, you’d see the same phenomenon. With the possible exception of ant-Perth threads, because Perth bashing cuts across all gender, racial, culture, class and political divides.

I learned to choose my idols well
and my current idol is Kelsey Griffin
why some nblers are almost getting her kinda numbers

Should NBL get better looking fitter and more intelligent hosts?

If you're going to troll, at least make it FUNNY.

Should hoops.com.au have more attractive posters?


Stupid question.
