Hoops

Start a new topic

Choose the category that best suits your topic.

Check this if your topic contains a game spoiler (e.g., an NBA game that might be televised later).

Check this if your topic is spam.

You must read the Terms of Use. Please do not post offensive material.
Learn how to embed YouTube videos or tweets

array(2) { [0]=> string(815) " select r.*, rc.info, t.title as threadtitle, u.username as username, u.anonymous as useranonymous, `f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`, `ft`.`name` AS `flairname`, `ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`, `ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon` from reply as r join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id join user as u on u.id = r.userid left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid` left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid` where r.businessid = :businessId and r.threadid = :threadId group by r.id order by r.utcdated desc limit 0,50 " [1]=> array(2) { ["businessId"]=> int(1) ["threadId"]=> int(45509) } }

hoopie

Years ago

Melbourne Tigers 199?

Thanks for that - I couldn’t find any team lists when I went looking.

Reply #750995 Report this topic

hoopie

Years ago

Thanks, mate. I’ll assume it’s Matthew Reece, as it looks kind of like a 34.

Reply #750937 Report this topic

Cram

Years ago

If it was pre-Bradtke it'd have to be 92 which would be possible. Brett Rainbow and Andrew Walter didn't play that season but they could have been on the roster.

Other option is Bradtke was on his Tennis voyage for much of 95 so it could have been then? That would match with Blair Smith

Reply #750930 Report this topic

Cram

Years ago

Ooh yeah it could be 95

Blair joined the club in 95 so it could be then actually. He was #31. Means the other one could have been Matthew Reece (Who could have been #34?)

Reply #750929 Report this topic

hoopie

Years ago

Thanks, Cram. I have this vague memory that Bradtke hadn’t joined the team at the time the ball was signed. Could that be right?

And the other one doesn’t look like any of the names you suggest.

Reply #750928 Report this topic

hoopie

Years ago

Was it too early for Blair Smith?

Reply #750926 Report this topic

Cram

Years ago

Wait Hinchen was a couple of years later. scratch him

Reply #750914 Report this topic

Cram

Years ago

Although it could be 93 as well.

Any chance the other 2 are any of

#50 Mark Bradtke
#52 Robert Sibley
(#24?) Vince Hinchen
#20 Chris Anstey

Reply #750913 Report this topic

Cram

Years ago

Could be 94

6 Warwick Giddey
10 Andrew Gaze
8 Ray Gordon
23 Brett Rainbow
33 Stephen Whitehead

Ones I’m not sure about
32 Nick Tanner? (Tenner)
28 David Sirmiano? (25 -Dave Simmons)
11 ?? (Andrew Walter)
21 ?? (Lanard Copeland)

Reply #750909 Report this topic

hoopie

Years ago

Rumour around the traps is that the new nbl team will be owned by P&V holdings. Talk is the P&V represent names of two guys from a bayside association. Not too tricky to work that one out!

Reply #858142 Report this topic

Start a new topic

Melbourne Tigers 199?

Reply to this topic

Recent Posts