
ABL Coach rankings!!
The question remains, how could people know unless they've been coached by them all!? Some have the benefit of national league players, some have only junior squads, some have 3 guns and nobody else?!
I always find it hard to comprehaned how media-types can rate coaches based upon solely results! Just because you get results doesn't mean you're a good coach - and vice-versa.

C'mon now Hoop Addict, not even in the ball park.
Simpson hasn't improved the Centrals group, and only did well at Woodville with the horses. Hopkins and Loveday (while not a fav of mine) both need to move up.
In the ladies, Wallis is undefeated and while not top needs to move up. Lee just beat Green by, what? 40. Switch them around. And what has Williams done.
Men
York - Woodville - coaching + rectruiting
Ninnis -Sturt -results with good groups + good this year without
Hill - Eastern - Always solid with no team depth
Simmons - Forrestville - doing a good job with changing group
Hopkins - Overachieving
Loveday - In the mix
Simpson - Centrals - Not enough improvement
Hunnerup - Always the bradesmaid
Dodson - Norwood - Too many cooks
Scanlon - South - Hard place to start
Women
Kinsman - Forrestville - Always up the top
Wallis - North - Undefeated must count for something
Smyth - West - Always seems to over achieve
Lee - Sturt - Improving group as the season continues
Green - South - Good rectruiter - needs results
Williams - Eastern - Good coach, but needs some wins
Holland - Woodvile - Dito
Kinghorn - Tiger - Promises much, but produces little
Kellaway - Norwood - Classic underachieving
Leszczuk - Centrals - How would we know.
