array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(5039)
}
}
It is my understanding that the Government's assistance with the Dome payments is subject to the Dome not being used for any other activity other than Basketball. If a potential buyer for the 36ers was financially prepared to take ownership of the Dome and payout the debt, surely they would be able to do what they want with it. A contract to buy the 36ers could have a clause where BASA is to continue using it for its junior programmes for a period of 10 years (for example) and pay the owners $$$? each year to use it. The owners could also let it out for concerts and other activities. All this would amount to a fair investment for the money spent. The land value alone would run into millions. The Dome would be a money generating investment.