array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(7482)
}
}

Years ago
No Sale: Pickard
They would be stupid to think they could sell it with such a large debt attached!?
If that is the case than there is NO chance of a sale in my opinion.

Years ago
Not quite sure how you get that impression?
Gives me the impression that potential buyers are saying IF at least $10 million was reduced from the debt than more buyers would show interest.
Dosn't really say/imply anything about the Government even contemplating reducing the debt.
MY biggest question about this article is the fact that the Debt is part of the sale/deal/package?!
