array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(7599)
}
}

Anonymous
Years ago
Number of Imports per team....
Not sure if that is correct Kent. My understanding is that Asian players are still classed as imports. In the case of Singapore they are allowed two local players to suit up at home games only (development players and not in the 10) I dont think the same dispensation has been given to the Slingers as has been for the Breakers.


Years ago
having 3 imports per team??? hahaha now that's gold. the salary cap is already stretched to the limit with virtually every club in the league. What should the salary cap be??? Who is going to pay the wages for the 3rd import??? you??? i don't think so. And I was under the impression that the Singapore players would be allowed to play as locals, just like in the case of the Breakers.
