array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(7889)
}
}
Id go lanard over rose simply because he did sit out most of last year so he will be fresh & free from niggliung injuries etc. From what ive heard hes rearing to go also so that always helps, attitute is such a big thing in any sport and the more you want it the harder you are going to work to get it.
Question people: If Rose is on a 3 month contract, is there any rule that stops us picking him up later in the season if he has played on another team this year. Don't remember it happening before that's all.
Yea thats a tough question, ive always been a Rob Rose fan, but Lanard Copeland is also a heck of a player, and i think they both seem to be at the same stage of there career, so i guess its a case of seeing how they perform this season. One also may be asking a higher price than the other, which also would be a factor. At this stage i'll back Smyths judgement and say Copeland.