array(2) {
[0]=>
string(815) "
select r.*,
rc.info,
t.title as threadtitle,
u.username as username,
u.anonymous as useranonymous,
`f`.`value` AS `flairvalue`,
`ft`.`name` AS `flairname`,
`ft`.`colour` AS `flaircolour`,
`ft`.`icon` AS `flairicon`
from reply as r
join thread as t on t.id = r.threadid
join replycontent as rc on rc.replyid = r.id
join user as u on u.id = r.userid
left join `flair` `f` on `f`.`userid` = `u`.`id` and `f`.`categoryid` = `t`.`categoryid`
left join `flairoption` `ft` on `ft`.`id` = `f`.`flairoptionid`
where r.businessid = :businessId
and r.threadid = :threadId
group by r.id
order by r.utcdated desc
limit 0,50
"
[1]=>
array(2) {
["businessId"]=>
int(1)
["threadId"]=>
int(8672)
}
}

Years ago
Friday's debate
Suggest that the difference is an attitude of "what's good enough". Boomers V Greece at W.C. showed that the capacity is there (for all but say a minute) but not the consistency. It has to be demanded of all involved from BA through to the coach and players. The demand to consitently perform to up to level x should be the fundamental criterum that an each individual places on themself. It easily becomes contagious when done this way.
The opals present like a TEAM. One that is hungry to be better than they were last week, month, year.
The Boomers present like they hope to get over the line if someone steps up - Individual efforts. Like they've done enough once they've made the side.
